Pengganti Keimanan, Bayar Dulu (Jisyah) / Ikhwanul Muslimin paksa umat Kristen Koptik masuk Islam

wahyu_zein_alkaf wrote:

oglikom wrote:Inikan pendapat pribadi anda, baca lagi itu ayat dan anda membayar ZAKAT sedang kafir seperti saya membayar JISYAH.

Lalu kenapa? Saya rasa ayat tersebut tidak masalah, penjelasan sayapun tidak ada yang masalah.

Hanya saja anda yang mencari masalah  

oglikom wrote:Memang siapa yang bilang bahwa non Muslim membayar ZAKAT .

Non Muslim alias KAFIR boleh tetap dalam keimanan mereka asal MEMBAYAR JISYAH dan jelas bukan Alloh yang membutuhkan JISYAH tetapi Muhammad. Mangkanya untuk memelihara sumber penghasilannya Muhammad mengeluarkan ayat ini BOLEH KAFIR ASAL BAYAR JISYAH.

wahyu_zein_alkaf wrote:

oglikom wrote:Memang siapa yang bilang bahwa non Muslim membayar ZAKAT .

Non Muslim alias KAFIR boleh tetap dalam keimanan mereka asal MEMBAYAR JISYAH dan jelas bukan Alloh yang membutuhkan JISYAH tetapi Muhammad. Mangkanya untuk memelihara sumber penghasilannya Muhammad mengeluarkan ayat ini BOLEH KAFIR ASAL BAYAR JISYAH.

Terus masalahnya apa? Saya rasa Jizyah tidak ada bedanya dengan pajak yang diindonesia. Yaitu sama - sama untuk pembangunan dan sumber daya.

Hanya saja Jizyah yang dibayarkan oleh non muslim lebih sedikit dari pada Zakat yang dikeluarkan oleh orang Islam, mereka yang membayar Jizyah diperbolehkan memakai fasilitas yang ada secara penuh sama seperti orang muslim tanpa ada diskriminisasi, ditambah mereka yang membayar sedikit tidak diwajibkan ikut perang sedangkan yang membayar lebih banyak wajib ikut perang. Saya tanya masalahnya dimana?  

oglikom wrote:BOLEH KAFIR ASAL BAYAR JISYAH.

Insya Allah wrote:
jizyah itu pengganti zakat.. jadi adil:

muslim = bayar zakat
Non muslim: bayar Jizyah

enak amat kalau sudah numpang di negara syariat tetapi tidak mau bayar jizyah.. muslim saja bayar zakat, non muslim masa enggan bayar jizyah? kalau ngga mau/keberatan bisa pindah ke denmark yang pajaknya mencapai 75.000 usd.. atau masuk islam. tapi masuk islam sama saja harus bayar zakat.
 

wahyu_zein_alkaf wrote:

oglikom wrote:Memang siapa yang bilang bahwa non Muslim membayar ZAKAT .

Non Muslim alias KAFIR boleh tetap dalam keimanan mereka asal MEMBAYAR JISYAH dan jelas bukan Alloh yang membutuhkan JISYAH tetapi Muhammad. Mangkanya untuk memelihara sumber penghasilannya Muhammad mengeluarkan ayat ini BOLEH KAFIR ASAL BAYAR JISYAH.

Terus masalahnya apa? Saya rasa Jizyah tidak ada bedanya dengan pajak yang diindonesia. Yaitu sama - sama untuk pembangunan dan sumber daya.

Hanya saja Jizyah yang dibayarkan oleh non muslim lebih sedikit dari pada Zakat yang dikeluarkan oleh orang Islam, mereka yang membayar Jizyah diperbolehkan memakai fasilitas yang ada secara penuh sama seperti orang muslim tanpa ada diskriminisasi, ditambah mereka yang membayar sedikit tidak diwajibkan ikut perang sedangkan yang membayar lebih banyak wajib ikut perang. Saya tanya masalahnya dimana?  

Use of jizya tax

jizya was used to build mosques, buy freedom for Muslim prisoners of war in non-Muslim states, fund Islamic charities meant to help Muslims, fund enlargement of armies, and pay for the wars of expansion.[86][87][88] Non-Muslims and slaves owned by Muslims had no right to expenditures or grants from any collected jizya and other taxes.[89] jizya and associated taxes also ended up in "private" treasuries.[

tentara islam kalah.. baru ngemis ke orang kristen buat bantu! dengan iming iming bebas jizyah!

udah miskin, di pajaki lagi!! dengan dalih uang keamanan! udah dibantu saat muslim kalah perang, eh masih bayar "sedekah"!!
anak anak mereka ga boleh masuk agama orang tuanya lagi!!

menurut ente ya mus.. agama ente ini gimana??

musicman wrote:@Ramayana

tentara islam kalah.. baru ngemis ke orang kristen buat bantu! dengan iming iming bebas jizyah!

Nah..nah..

dimana di link anda yg menyebutkan keikut sertaan bani taghrib setelah kekalahan Pasukan Muslim?
Kesimpulannya jangan hanya berdasar nafsu.Tidak baik...

Segitu banyaknya sumber tapi tidak memberikan "kemajuan" apa-apa dalam bahasan kita namanya...

Kalaulah memang Bani Taghrib turut serta bergabung dengan pasukan muslim, adalah sebuah konsekuensi logis dalam artian hal yg perlu dilakukan mengingat sebagai warga negara yg bernaung dalam pemerintahan Islam. Tidak juga ada keterangan bahwa Khalifah umar Mengemis-ngemis..

Karena itu.. Jizyah mereka tidak berlaku lagi. Inilah yg saya katakan Wajib militer menjadi taruhannya.

udah miskin, di pajaki lagi!! dengan dalih uang keamanan! udah dibantu saat muslim kalah perang, eh masih bayar "sedekah"!!
anak anak mereka ga boleh masuk agama orang tuanya lagi!!

menurut ente ya mus.. agama ente ini gimana??

Apalagi ini maksudnya?

gimana kabar dinar emas?

 

musicman wrote:@Ramayana
Tetap tidak menghilangkan keheranan saya...sejak kapan yg namanya SEDEQAH menjadi suatu kewajiban yg bersifat Nominal tetap dan dibatasi waktu2 tertentu?

gimana kabar dinar emas?

 

Speechless..sudah saya katakan.
Saya tidak tertarik buang2 waktu dengan member yg lbh suka berhalunisasi dengan pendapat sendiri yg saya sendiri heran sebetulnya..dimana korelasinya dengan sumber.

Tuh liat...
anda sudah mengarah kesana..sedeqah sudah mulai anda tafsirkan satu konsep dengan JIzyah yg memiliki nominal tetap dan terkonsep secara waktu.
luar biasa memang, kalau nafsu membinasakan yg sudah jadi Acuan..

Saya tinggal menunggu moment yg tepat saja untuk meninggalkan anda...
tapi cm blm saatnya saja..

Taghlib was one of the few Arab tribes that did not accept Islam during Muhammad's time nor during the rule of his immediate successors. After Muhammad's death, some sections of Taghlib joined in the Ridda Wars ("Wars of the Apostasy"), supporting the claimed prophecy of a woman from Banu Tamim named Sajah. Upon the suppression of the apostasy, Taghlib is said to have reached an agreement to remain Christian in exchange for paying a levy to the reigning caliph. According to this narration, Taghlib, requested that the levy be termed a sadaka ("alms"), similar to what was collected from Muslim tribes, in lieu of the jizya ("tribute" or "poll tax") that was normally taken from non-Muslims. The caliphs agreed.

It was stated in 'Al-Muhadh'dhab' from the Shaafi'iy Fiqh: "If a people abstain from giving the Jizyah with the name of Jizyah and say: We will give it with the name of Sadaqah (i.e. Zakaah) and the Imaam viewed that it (Jizyah) can be taken with the naming of Sadaqah, this is permissible because the Arab Christians said to 'Umar (ra) that: We will not give what the non-Arabs give but rather take from us with the naming of Sadaqah like the naming given to that which is taken from the Arabs! So 'Umar (ra) refused this and said: I do not approve except the Jizyah for you. So they said: Take from us double that which is taken from the Muslims. So he refused this from them (as well). They wanted to be attached to the Daar ul-Harb (land of war) so Zur'ah Bin Nu'maan or Nu'maan Bin Zur'ah said to 'Umar: Bani Taghlib are Arabs and they possess force so take from them (these Christians) like what they (Bani Taghlib) have given and don't let them join with your enemy. So 'Umar made a treaty with them upon double the amount of the Zakaah.." (Al-Muhadh'dhab, Ash-Sheeraaziy: 250251/2).

It was stated in Al-Mughni Al-Muhtaaj in relation to this: "And he took the Jizyah using the name of Sadaqah and none of the Sahaabah objected to him (i.e, 'Umar) and so it was and Ijmaa' (consensus) and a permanent Dhimmah was contracted for them... And the most correct view is that there is no difference in regards to this between the Arabs and non-Arabs... He then said: And its doubling is not specified..." (Mughni Al-Muhtaaj: 251-252/4).

The following was stated in Ibn Qudaamah's Al-Mughni of the Hanbali fiqh: "Banu Taghliba Bin Waa'il are from the Arabs by way of Rabee'ah Bin Nizaar. In the times of Jaahilliyah (pre-Islaam) they became Christians so 'Umar invited them to give the Jizyah but they refused and were adamant about it! They said: We are Arabs! Take from us like you take from amongst yourselves with the naming of Sadaqah. So 'Umar said: I will not take Sadaqah from a Mushrik. So some of them aligned themselves with the Romans. Then Nu'maan Bin Zur'ah said: O Ameer Al-Mu'mineen these people possess a strength and power and they are Arabs and resist the Jizyah so don't let your enemy be aided (strengthened) by them. Take the Jizyah from them with the naming of Sadaqah. So 'Umar looked into their demands and agreed to make it double upon them. So this became settled by 'Umar and none of the Sahaabah opposed him and as such it became an Ijmaa' (consensus). And the Fuqahaa after the Sahaabah held this view and they included: Ibn Abi Laylaa, Al-Hasan Bin Saalih, Abu Haneefah, Abu Yousuf, Ash-Shaafi'iy...." (Al-Mughni. Ibn Qudaamah, 590/591/10).

http://www.khilafah.com/index.php/the-khilafah/non-muslims/15385-part-3-the-alternative-to-the-jizyah

musicman wrote:@Ramayana
Sumber sendiri saja ngga dibaca lengkap...apa yg anda mau banggakan kalau begitu dr diri anda?


Umar jelas menolak kemauan Jizyah yg diberikan oleh Bani Taghlib "...So 'Umar (ra) refused this and said: I do not approve except the Jizyah for you. ."
Pada Akhirnya atas desakan dr Bani Taghlib sendiri yg memaksa untuk menyerahkan 2x lipat dengan deal nama Sedeqah, KOk malah Muslim yg anda disalahkan?

Asbun ah..

Bani Taghlib itu terbagi 2 kelompok dimana komunitas Nasrani dari kalangan mereka menempati daerah Romawi yg tergolong Makmur dan Kaya raya. Jadi Usaha anda menggeneralisir bahwa semua Bani Taghlib itu melarat itu Lemah Fakta.




Kewajiban Jizyah ditukar Sedeqah yg tidak mengikat seperti Jizyah malah lebih Gila lagi anda tafsirkan Menzhalimi kaum Bani Taghlib?

Lima ratus perak, seribu perak itu pantang ditolak dalam sedeqah. Enak kan?
Makmur tp cm dibebani Sedeqah menggugurkan Jizyah karena Turut dalam Wajib militer...


Penzhaliman yg lebih brutal dr Pajak modern ya?
Sip lah...Poll bener deh "tengkurap"nya..

Take the Jizyah from them with the naming of Sadaqah.

ente tau arti kalimat ini ga sih mus??????

yg kaya masuk romawi krn mereka punya uang buat pindah.. tinggal yg miskin tinggal di daerah islam. lalu yg bayar jizyah siapa mus?? yg miskin!! ini kan logika sederhana mus.

musicman wrote:@Ramayana

ente tau arti kalimat ini ga sih mus??????

Ada apa memangnya dengan kalimat itu?

Kalau mau menggal-menggal kalimat tanpa melihat suatu keutuhan suatu masalah, itu memang "LUMRAH" kalau instink Nafsu yg berbicara.

Bani Taghlib menyerahkan 2xlipat Terjadi atas inisiatifnya dan kalau saya mau "JAHAT" tentu akan saya balik juga bertanya :

.."apakah anda tahu arti "...So 'Umar (ra) refused this and said: I do not approve except the Jizyah for you. ."

atau .......bagaimana harus saya meladeni anda?

Bani Taghlib memang Kaum yg Pandai bertempur, karena itu Umar bahasa sederhananya "MENUKAR" JIzyah dengan Kewajiban tempur mereka. Tolakan Umar menerima Jizyah dari mereka (Bani Taghlib) menunjukan Jiwa besar, sehingga pemaksaan yg mereka (Bani Taghlib)  beri karena JIwa Toleransi tinggi akan Manfaat Baitul Mal memberi effect Sedeqah dengan nilai 2x Lipat. Atas Inisiatif mereka sendiri..karena menguntungkan Semua Masyarakat..Muslim dan Kafir dimana Tunjangan terhadap Kafir2 miskin pun ada.
THAT"S IT!

Kaum MISKIN mana yg secara Sukarela Menyerahkan Hartanya Kepada Negara dengan 2x lipat lebih besar dari masyarakat Umum ..kalau mereka bukan Kaum yg memiliki Harta Berlebih?

Tuduhan biadab terhadap JIzyah itu tuduhan benang basah, kalau Pajak saja sudah sedemikian Jauh meninggalkan Kwalitas Kemanusiaan Jizyah.

It was stated in 'Al-Muhadh'dhab' from the Shaafi'iy Fiqh: "If a people abstain from giving the Jizyah with the name of Jizyah and say: We will give it with the name of Sadaqah (i.e. Zakaah) and the Imaam viewed that it (Jizyah) can be taken with the naming of Sadaqah, this is permissible because the Arab Christians said to 'Umar (ra) that: We will not give what the non-Arabs give but rather take from us with the naming of Sadaqah like the naming given to that which is taken from the Arabs! So 'Umar (ra) refused this and said: I do not approve except the Jizyah for you. So they said: Take from us double that which is taken from the Muslims. So he refused this from them (as well). They wanted to be attached to the Daar ul-Harb (land of war) so Zur'ah Bin Nu'maan or Nu'maan Bin Zur'ah said to 'Umar: Bani Taghlib are Arabs and they possess force so take from them (these Christians) like what they (Bani Taghlib) have given and don't let them join with your enemy. So 'Umar made a treaty with them upon double the amount of the Zakaah.." (Al-Muhadh'dhab, Ash-Sheeraaziy: 250251/2).

It was stated in Al-Mughni Al-Muhtaaj in relation to this: "And he took the Jizyah using the name of Sadaqah and none of the Sahaabah objected to him (i.e, 'Umar) and so it was and Ijmaa' (consensus) and a permanent Dhimmah was contracted for them... And the most correct view is that there is no difference in regards to this between the Arabs and non-Arabs... He then said: And its doubling is not specified..." (Mughni Al-Muhtaaj: 251-252/4).

The following was stated in Ibn Qudaamah's Al-Mughni of the Hanbali fiqh: "Banu Taghliba Bin Waa'il are from the Arabs by way of Rabee'ah Bin Nizaar. In the times of Jaahilliyah (pre-Islaam) they became Christians so 'Umar invited them to give the Jizyah but they refused and were adamant about it! They said: We are Arabs! Take from us like you take from amongst yourselves with the naming of Sadaqah. So 'Umar said: I will not take Sadaqah from a Mushrik. So some of them aligned themselves with the Romans. Then Nu'maan Bin Zur'ah said: O Ameer Al-Mu'mineen these people possess a strength and power and they are Arabs and resist the Jizyah so don't let your enemy be aided (strengthened) by them. Take the Jizyah from them with the naming of Sadaqah. So 'Umar looked into their demands and agreed to make it double upon them. So this became settled by 'Umar and none of the Sahaabah opposed him and as such it became an Ijmaa' (consensus). And the Fuqahaa after the Sahaabah held this view and they included: Ibn Abi Laylaa, Al-Hasan Bin Saalih, Abu Haneefah, Abu Yousuf, Ash-Shaafi'iy...." (Al-Mughni. Ibn Qudaamah, 590/591/10).

http://www.khilafah.com/index.php/the-khilafah/non-muslims/15385-part-3-the-alternative-to-the-jizyah

musicman wrote:@Ramayana

yg kaya masuk romawi krn mereka punya uang buat pindah.. tinggal yg miskin tinggal di daerah islam. lalu yg bayar jizyah siapa mus?? yg miskin!! ini kan logika sederhana mus.

YG bayar adalah Bani Tahglib yg kaya...

Logikamu Tidak berlaku disini. Patah dengan fakta yg ada..
Memang sejak kapan Romawi pada jaman Umar bukan bagian dari Khilafah Islam?


Asbun non stop ya?
sip deh....makin poll "tengkurapnya"..

Dari Zur’ah ibnun-Nu’man atau an-Nu’man bin Zurah bahwa dia pernah bertanya kepada Umar ibnul Khaththab. Dia telah membicarakan mengenai persoalan bani Taghlib. Sementara Umar berkeinginan mengambil jizyah dari mereka. Lalu mereka banyak yang melarikan diri keseluruh plosok negeri. An-Nu’man atau Zur’ah ibnu Nu’man berkata, “Wahai Amirul Mukminin, sesungguhnya bani Taghlib juga termasuk bangsa Arab. Mereka sangat enggan membayar jizyah, ditambah lagi mereka adalah orang yang tidak memiliki harta kekayaan. Mereka hanyalah orang yang memiliki profesi bercocok tanam dan pengembala. Mereka sangat handal dalam peperangan dan strategi untuk melawan mereka. Oleh karena itu, jangalah engkau meminta bantuan kepada mereka untuk memerangi musuhmu.”

Logikamu Tidak berlaku disini. Patah dengan fakta yg ada..
Memang sejak kapan Romawi pada jaman Umar bukan bagian dari Khilafah Islam?

udah ane kasih tuh.. di baca lagi!! kalau mereka bisa, mereka ga mau bayar mus!! mereka bayar 2 kali aja itu hasil nego! hahahahahahahahaha

intinya adalah.. mereka bayar jizyah hanya di namakan sadaqah!!
jadi bacotan kalau ikut wamil ga bayar jizyah adalah bullshit!!

..... mereka adalah orang yang tidak memiliki harta kekayaan.

kasian ente mus.... hahahahahahahahahahaha.

di tambah ini yang bikin ngakak!!

perlu ane ulang ya mus...

musicman wrote:
Ucapan tsb tentu saja sebagai pertimbangan Umar agar tidak menerapkan hal yg memberatkan Bagi golongan yg sudah Melarat, karena golongan yg satunya kaya, mereka meyerahkan 2x lipat, dan sempat ditolak Umar karena mereka sudah bebas JIZYAH

Ucapan tsb tentu saja sebagai pertimbangan Umar agar tidak menerapkan hal yg memberatkan Bagi golongan yg sudah Melarat, karena golongan yg satunya kaya, mereka meyerahkan 2x lipat, dan sempat ditolak Umar karena mereka sudah bebas JIZYAH

“Wahai Amirul Mukminin, sesungguhnya bani Taghlib juga termasuk bangsa Arab. Mereka sangat enggan membayar jizyah, ditambah lagi mereka adalah orang yang tidak memiliki harta kekayaan.

Bani Taghlib itu terbagi 2 kelompok dimana komunitas Nasrani dari kalangan mereka menempati daerah Romawi yg tergolong Makmur dan Kaya raya. Jadi Usaha anda menggeneralisir bahwa semua Bani Taghlib itu melarat itu Lemah Fakta.

mus wrote:Kalau umar nego dengan bawahannya, faktanya umar menolak pembayaran yg diberikan Bani Taghlib sebesar 2x lipat.

mus wrote:pertimbangan Umar agar tidak menerapkan hal yg memberatkan Bagi golongan yg sudah Melarat, karena golongan yg satunya kaya, mereka meyerahkan 2x lipat, dan sempat ditolak Umar karena mereka sudah bebas JIZYAH

The following was stated in Ibn Qudaamah's Al-Mughni of the Hanbali fiqh: "Banu Taghliba Bin Waa'il are from the Arabs by way of Rabee'ah Bin Nizaar. In the times of Jaahilliyah (pre-Islaam) they became Christians so 'Umar invited them to give the Jizyah but they refused and were adamant about it! They said: We are Arabs! Take from us like you take from amongst yourselves with the naming of Sadaqah. So 'Umar said: I will not take Sadaqah from a Mushrik. So some of them aligned themselves with the Romans. Then Nu'maan Bin Zur'ah said: O Ameer Al-Mu'mineen these people possess a strength and power and they are Arabs and resist the Jizyah so don't let your enemy be aided (strengthened) by them. Take the Jizyah from them with the naming of Sadaqah. So 'Umar looked into their demands and agreed to make it double upon them. So this became settled by 'Umar and none of the Sahaabah opposed him and as such it became an Ijmaa' (consensus). And the Fuqahaa after the Sahaabah held this view and they included: Ibn Abi Laylaa, Al-Hasan Bin Saalih, Abu Haneefah, Abu Yousuf, Ash-Shaafi'iy...." (Al-Mughni. Ibn Qudaamah, 590/591/10).

Take the Jizyah from them with the naming of Sadaqah

mus wrote:lebih bikin ngakak mana, yg asbun kalau Jizyah tidak ada wajib militer tapi faktanya non muslim bebas Jizyah tapi ikut tempur dibelakang muslim?

musicman wrote:@Ramayana
Saya liat2, sepertinya karena keunggulan KOnsep Jizyah yg jauh "meninggalkan" konsep serupa (Penaklukan Musuh) pada Jaman Pra Islam dan bahkan Modern yg dipraktekan dengan nama Pajak sudah membuat anda "takut" dan sesak ya bung Ramayana...sehingga gaya tulisan anda dan semua perpektifnya jauh dari terkesan tepat dan (MAAF) sangat Lebay dari fakta persepsi yg sudah disepakati oleh muslim sekalipun..?

Rate of jizya tax[edit]

Yusuf claims there was no amount permanently fixed for the tax, though the payment usually depended on wealth: the Kitab al-Kharaj of Abu Yusuf sets the amounts at 48 dirhams for the richest (e.g. moneychangers), 24 for those of moderate wealth, and 12 for craftsmen and manual laborers.[12][53]

Other scholars[54][55][56] claim the tax rates and amounts were fixed and strictly implemented. The rate of jizya and Kharaj tax, head tax and land tax respectively, exceeded 20% for all non-Muslims, and payable by new moon. In the western Islamic states, for dhimmis who were Christians and Jews of Egypt and Morocco, these taxes were often graded into three levels with minimum rate being 20% of all estimated assets and any sales.[57] The highest rates ranged from 33% to 80% of all annual farm produce on land inside the Islamic empire.[58] In the eastern Islamic states, for dhimmis who were Hindus and Jains, the tax structure were similar, with non-Muslims paying jizya and Kharaj tax rate at least twice the zakat tax rate paid by Muslims. The discriminatory and high tax rates led to mass civil protests of 1679 in India, these protests were crushed by Aurangzeb.[50][59]

In return for the tax, those who paid the jizya were permitted to keep their religion, practice it in private without offending Muslims, but were not allowed to build new Churches, Synagogues or Temples.[60][61] They were considered to be under the protection of the Muslim state, subject to their meeting certain conditions.[57][62]

Associated taxes with jizya[edit]

Along with jizya as head tax (sometimes called neck tax), non-Muslims were also required to pay Kharaj as land tax. This was levied on anyone who worked on land or owned property on land. Both jizya and kharaj were not payable by Muslims or if the non-Muslim converted to Islam.[57][63][64]

Other taxes payable, by or from the property of non-Muslim subjects, along with jizya were fai, ghanima and ushur. Fai (sometimes spelled fay) was non-Muslim property seized by a Muslim official; the non-Muslim was sometimes allowed to reclaim the seized property by paying 100% of assessed value of the seized property.[65][66] Ghanima was the 20% tax paid by the Muslim army commander on the booty and plunder collected from non-Muslims by force (anwatan) after a war or after the commander launched a raid against non-Muslim trade posts, temples, or caravans. The commander and his Muslim soldiers were entitled to keep 80% of the booty.[67][68] Ushur (sometimes spelled ushr) was customs tax payable when people entered or exited the borders of an Islamic state. Non-Muslims paid twice the rate than Muslims on assessed value of property in possession of the transiting person. This was in addition to the jizya.[69][70]

jizya and other associated taxes were payable by sedentary non-Muslim populations. Sadaqa was a tax levied on nomadic people, instead of jizya.[71][72] There is some controversy is sadaqa was mandatory or voluntary.[73]

Punishment for failure to pay taxes[edit]

According to Abu Yusuf, jurist of Harun al-Rashid, those who didn't pay jizya should be imprisoned not to be let out of custody until payment.[74] Though it was an annual tax, non-Muslims were allowed to pay it in monthly installments.[12] If someone had agreed to pay jizya, leaving Muslim territory for non-Muslim land was, in theory, punishable by enslavement if they were ever captured. This punishment did not apply if the person had suffered injustices from Muslims.[75]

In practice, non-payment of jizya tax, or the associated Kharaj tax, by any non-Muslim subject in a Muslim state was punished by his family's arrest and enslavement.[76][77][78] The women and girls of an enslaved family would become property of a Muslim master and serve as houseworkers and female sex slaves (raqiq or baghiya).[79][80] A non-Muslim could avoid arrest or stop paying the jizya tax any time by converting to Islam as it was a punishment for not accepting Islam, and he was constantly reminded of this.[81] In some regions of Islamic rule, the Sultans faced rebellion and the non-Muslim masses refused to convert to Islam or pay jizya.[82] Militant opposition erupted to Islamic punishment for refusal to pay discriminatory jizya taxes, such as in India, Spain and Morocco.[58][83][84] In some cases, this led to its periodic abolishment such as the 1704 AD suspension of jizya in Deccan region of India by Aurangzeb.[85]

Use of jizya tax[edit]

jizya was used to build mosques, buy freedom for Muslim prisoners of war in non-Muslim states, fund Islamic charities meant to help Muslims, fund enlargement of armies, and pay for the wars of expansion.[86][87][88] Non-Muslims and slaves owned by Muslims had no right to expenditures or grants from any collected jizya and other taxes.[89] jizya and associated taxes also ended up in "private" treasuries.[4]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jizya#Associated_taxes_with_jizya

ane nanya sejujurnya mus.. apalagi ada kasus bani taglib. yg ikut perang tetep bayar jizyah. adilkah??
apakah uang jizyah juga buat kesejahteraan mereka????? sama seperti zakat yg buat kesejahteraan muslim????

halo mus....

..ente mau ngeyel romawi jajahan umar lagi?? hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha...